🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 383+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Mickey Mouse Backscratcher

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (383 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$4.55
$7.58
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Walt Disney World Mickey Mouse 16 Backscratcher.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Mickey Mouse Backscratcher

Vintage Walt Disney World Mickey Mouse 16" Backscratcher.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1095434

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Other

Original Price: $7.58 USD

Sale Price: $4.55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1867 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
Personally, the Vintage Mickey Mouse Backscratcher does its job and I’m satisfied.
22 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable choice
After a few days, it works as described so it’s acceptable.
20 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Super happy
After a few days, the Vintage Mickey Mouse Backscratcher feels okay and I’m satisfied.
14 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
From my experience, it is uncomplicated to use and I’m satisfied.
35 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly advise!
So far, it feels okay which feels reasonable. Nothing fancy.
50 people found this helpful