🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 954+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

JUBYK - Shorts - ecru

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (954 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$40​
$66.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighPockets : Side pocketsPattern : PlainDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : AM221S019-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

JUBYK - Shorts - ecru

Rise : High
Pockets : Side pockets
Pattern : Plain
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : AM221S019-A11​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1579014

Category: Women > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price: $66.67 USD

Sale Price: $40 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3655 reviews
WG
William Garcia
2 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
solely what I wanted
For the price, the JUBYK - Shorts - ecru works as described and it’s fine overall. No setup issues.
4 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson
9 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier purchase ever
Everything works as expected JUBYK - Shorts - ecru.
50 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
Overall, the JUBYK - Shorts - ecru is acceptable.
21 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts
2 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding choice
For the price, the JUBYK - Shorts - ecru performs as expected and it works for me.
43 people found this helpful

MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceptional quality
Honestly, it is practical so it’s acceptable.
19 people found this helpful